A matter of principle: A response to Stephen Downes’s “On ethical AI principles”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25619/129g6j48Keywords:
Principle, AI, generative AI, GenAI, education, ethics, technologyAbstract
This paper is written as a response to Stephen Downes’s “On ethical AI principles”, that we recommend should be read in advance. Though framed as a critique, it builds on Downes’s work, filling in gaps and arguments that we believe to be missing from the original and challenging some assumptions, while acknowledging the soundness of the underlying messages. Our central point of disagreement stems from Downes’s implied definition of the word “principle”. We extend the argument from Downes’s generic concerns about principles to a more specific educational context, highlight fuzziness in definitions, and reframe Downes’s concerns that principles are political as more general issues of power.
Downloads
Published
Data Availability Statement
N/A
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jon Dron, Stella George

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As a condition of publication, the author agrees to apply the Creative Commons – Attribution International 4.0 (CC-BY) License to JODDE articles. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
This license allows anyone to reproduce JODDE articles at no cost and without further permission as long as they attribute the author and the journal. This permission includes printing, sharing, and other forms of distribution.
Author(s) hold copyright in their work, and retain publishing rights without restrictions.
